Understand execution
Inspect recorded execution and model usage without losing the customer being served.
AI & agent observability
Inspect what your own AI application recorded: model calls, tool steps, usage, cost and quality evidence. Each run stays connected to the customer it served. Anectico records this. It does not run an AI.
Inspect recorded model calls, tool steps and run status.
Follow tokens, calculated cost and latency with customer context.
Configured evaluations and attributed human feedback stay distinct.
01The execution story
Your agent reads a recorded run and follows its model calls, tool activity and declared outcome. You open the run page to check the steps, token use and calculated cost, with the customer context captured with the execution.
02Quality with provenance
Versioned evaluators run configured automatic checks. Attributed human feedback records a reviewer’s judgment. Inspect the run and the evidence behind a result before you make a release decision.
The workflow, connected
Understand the run itself, then inspect the quality and customer context around it.
Record model calls and tool activity, with the customer identity when available.
Your agent follows recorded steps, declared status, model usage and calculated cost.
Inspect evaluation and feedback evidence, then follow the linked customer story.
The capabilities behind it
Understand the recorded work your agents perform and keep the relevant context and access choices beside it.
Inspect recorded execution and model usage without losing the customer being served.
Follow captured context, memory provenance and the sources behind quality judgments.
Review agent inventory, containment and project-level content policy.
Put it to work
Inspect the recorded execution and the service or customer evidence around the failed step.
Explore this workflowFollow recorded model calls, tokens, calculated cost and latency with person-linked context.
Explore this workflowInspect evaluator provenance and keep automatic scores distinct from attributed human feedback.
Explore this workflowYour first useful workflow
Verify the captured run before you add automatic evaluations or change content-policy choices.
A few useful answers
Captured model calls, tool steps, execution status, token use, calculated cost, latency and the linked customer evidence, subject to your project’s recorded data and access.
Human feedback and configured automatic evaluations stay separate. A score names its evaluator and version. The quality guide explains evaluators, sampling and the evidence behind scores.
Yes. Agents & MCP explains how to connect your own agent so it can investigate and act through Anectico.
No. Human feedback records an attributed reviewer’s judgment. Automatic results identify the configured evaluator and its version. They are stored and displayed separately.
No. Automatic checks need a configured evaluator and a sampling rule. A score always names the evaluator and the version that produced it.
Anectico / Private preview
Explore recorded execution and customer-linked quality evidence in private preview.